Acquiring the skills and knowledge required to be education scholars, able to analyze and synthesize the research in a field of specialization, should be the focal, integrative activity of predissertation doctoral education. This article suggests criteria to evaluate the quality of dissertation literature reviews and reports a study that examined dissertations at three universities. Although doctoral education is a key means for improving education research, the literature has given short shrift to the dissertation literature review. The complex nature of education research demands such thorough, sophisticated reviews. įrom the abstract: A thorough, sophisticated literature review is the foundation and inspiration for substantial, useful research. Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation. The guide includes specific resources available at the university and online, reference styles, notes on plagiarism and copyright, information about presenting research and instructions for writing literature reviews that include examples of good and bad organization.īoote, David N., and Penny Beile. The Intelligent Transportation Systems Laboratory at Portland State University produced this guide for students conducting research. Introduction to Library and Literature Research for Transportation. The annotated section of your annotated bibliography (summary/assessment/reflection) should be in standard paragraph form.Bertini, Robert. Use the following guides to format your citation: MLA, APA, Chicago. The formatting of your annotated bibliography depends on which citation style you are directed to use. If you're doing this for a class, you should get specific guidelines from your instructor. Your annotated bibliography may include some of these, all of these, or even others (like an introductory statement of scope). Was this source helpful to you? How does it help you shape your argument? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic? Reflection: Once you've summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research.Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? Assessment: After summarizing a source, it may be helpful to evaluate it.What are the main arguments? What is the point of this book or article? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book is about, what would you say? The length of your annotations will determine how detailed your summary is. Summary: Some annotations merely summarize the source.Citation: A list of the elements that reference a work (book, article, etc.), that may include the title of the work, the author/editor, publisher, date published, volume, issue, and, if from the internet or a database, the url or doi.Your annotated bibliography can include four elements: the citation, a summary, an assessment, and a personal reflection. Parts of an Annotated Bibliography (taken from Purdue OWL): Writing an effective annotation requires you to clearly describe and evaluate the overarching argument of the source.Īn annotated bibliography is a valuable tool that prepares you to write a research paper by forcing you to closely read a book or article. It is also a means to help others locate a body of scholarship around a certain topic. An annotated bibliography includes a list of sources that you have found to use in your research paper (books, websites, journal articles, etc.) along with a brief summary and analysis of those sources.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |